Clinical Trials
Home › Technology › Clinical Trials
We currently have multiple product candidates that are in various stages of research and clinical development. The following list summarizes our most advanced product candidates and their stage of development:
- Bio-Seal™ biopsy track plug
- MultiStem® stem cell therapy
- Option™ vena cava filter
- 5-FU-eluting Central Venous Catheter (“CVC”)
- Vascular Wrap™ paclitaxel-eluting mesh
Bio-Seal™ biopsy track plug
Our proprietary Bio-Seal™ biopsy track plug is under evaluation in a pivotal human clinical trial. Bio-Seal™ is a novel technology designed to prevent air leaks in patients having lung biopsies by plugging the biopsy track with an expanding hydrogel plug. On contact with moist tissue, the hydrogel plug absorbs fluids and expands to fill the void created by the biopsy needle puncture. The seal is airtight and the plug is absorbed into the body after healing of the puncture site has occurred.
Bio-Seal is currently undergoing a human clinical trial in the U.S. designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Bio-Seal, with the primary endpoint being reduction in rates of pneumothorax in patients undergoing lung biopsy procedures. The clinical trial is a prospective randomized multi-centered safety and efficacy evaluation. The trial enrolled its first patient in October 2005 and completed enrolment in June 2008. The study is designed to provide a basis for U.S. clearance for the commercialization of Bio-Seal. Data from this clinical trial study have been submitted to the FDA, and we currently expect to receive 510(k) clearance from the FDA to market Bio-Seal in the U.S. in the first half of 2009. Our intention is to present the complete data at the 2009 Society of Interventional Radiology in San Diego. The product has already received CE Mark approval.
MultiStem® stem cell therapy
The MultiStem stem cell therapy is under evaluation in clinical trials being conducted together with our partner Athersys, Inc. (“Athersys”) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. MultiStem stem cells are proprietary adult stem cells derived from bone marrow, which have demonstrated the ability in laboratory experiments to form a wide range of cell types. MultiStem may work through several mechanisms, but a primary mechanism appears to be the production of multiple therapeutic molecules produced in response to inflammation and tissue damage. We and Athersys believe that MultiStem may represent a unique “off the shelf” stem cell product candidate, based on its potential ability to be used without tissue matching or immunosupression, and its potential capacity for large scale production. We entered an agreement with Athersys in May 2006 to co-develop and commercialize MultiStem for use in the indications of acute myocardial infarction and peripheral vascular disease.
On December 20, 2007, we and Athersys announced we had received authorization from the FDA to commence a phase I human clinical trial to evaluate the safety of MultiStem in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Upon completion of a phase I human clinical trial currently being conducted by Athersys, we may assume lead responsibility for further clinical development. We currently own marketing and commercialization rights with respect to this product candidate. On September 22, 2008, as part of certain cost reduction initiatives, we announced a potential amendment of, and reduction in, cash outlays related to our collaboration with Athersys. The final terms of such amendment to our collaboration with Athersys may have an impact on our expected future expenditures for research and development of MultiStem, and the extent of our future financial and commercial commitments and rights relating to this product candidate.
Option™ vena cava filter
The Option™ Vena Cava Filter, which we licensed in March 2008 from our partner Rex Medical L.P., is under evaluation in a pivotal human clinical trial. The purpose of the U.S. multi-center prospective clinical trial is to evaluate the device's safety and efficacy in preventing pulmonary emboli, and to assess the ability to retrieve the device from the body up to 175 days following implantation. We expect that we will release the results of this 100 patient trial in the spring of 2009 at the annual Society of Interventional Radiology meeting in San Diego. Interim results of the pivotal trial may be presented at the AIM/Veith Meeting in New York in November 2008, pending completion of final patient enrollment. This vena cava filter may have a number of potential benefits, which include unique filter apex and retention anchors, insertion through either the femoral or jugular route, and non-thrombogenic material. Upon completion of this clinical trial, we expect to submit a 510(k) application to the FDA in order to receive clearance to market and sell the Option Vena Cava Filter in the U.S.
5-FU-Eluting anti-infective Central Venous Catheter (“CVC”)
Central venous catheters (“CVC”) are usually inserted into critically ill patients for extended periods of time to administer fluids, drugs, and nutrition, as well as facilitate frequent blood draws. Through our proprietary drug identification strategy, we have elected to evaluate 5-Fluorouracil (“5-FU”), a drug previously approved by the FDA for treatment of various types of cancer, as a compound that may help to prevent certain types of infection in patients receiving a CVC. We recently completed a human clinical trial in the U.S. designed to assess the safety and efficacy of our 5-FU-eluting CVC in preventing various types of catheter related infections. The study was a randomized, single-blind, 960-patient, 25-center study and was designed to evaluate whether our 5-FU-eluting CVC prevents bacterial colonization at least as well as the market leading anti-infective CVC.
On July 10, 2007, we announced that we had completed enrolment of the study, and on October 9, 2007 we announced this study had met its primary statistical endpoint of non-inferiority as compared to the market leading anti-infective CVC (a chlorhexidine / silver sulfadiazine (CH-SS) coated CVC) and indicated an excellent safety profile. Based on the positive results achieved in the study, in December 2007 we filed a request for 510(k) clearance from the FDA to market and sell the CVC in the U.S.
In March 2008, we presented the clinical trial data at the 28th International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (ISICEM) in Brussels, Belgium. Based on the clinical trial data, the investigators concluded that our 5-FU CVC met the primary endpoint of the study, specifically that our 5-FU CVC product candidate was non-inferior in its ability to prevent bacterial colonization of the catheter tip when compared to catheters coated with CH-SS. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of adverse events related to the study devices, or in the rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Additionally, there was no evidence for acquired resistance to 5-FU in clinical isolates exposed to the drug for a second time.
On April 17, 2008, we announced that we had received 510(k) clearance from the FDA to market our 5-FU CVC in the United States.
Vascular Wrap™ paclitaxel-eluting mesh
Our paclitaxel-eluting mesh surgical implant, or Vascular Wrap, is designed to treat complications, including graft stenosis or restenosis, that may occur in connection with vascular graft implants in hemodialysis patients or in patients that have peripheral artery disease. Vascular grafts are implanted in patients in order to bypass diseased blood vessels, or to provide access to the vascular system of kidney failure patients in order to facilitate the process of hemodialysis. In many cases, these vascular grafts fail due to proliferation of cells or scar into the graft (graft stenosis or restenosis), which can negatively impact blood flow through the vascular graft.
In April 2008, we elected to suspend enrollment in our U.S. and EU human clinical trials for our Vascular Wrap product candidate in patients undergoing surgery for hemodialysis access, pending a safety review to evaluate an imbalance of infections observed between the two study groups. As a result of these observations, we elected to notify physicians to suspend further enrolment in the trials, pending a full review of the potential cause of the implant site infections. There are currently no plans to resume enrollment in these clinical trials, and we are continuing to evaluate alternatives for this program, including potential collaborations, partnerships, divestitures or future clinical development initiatives.
